Serendipity in doctoral education: the importance of chance and the prepared mind in the phd
When Louis Pasteur remarked that chance favours the prepared mind, he was commenting on the important role played by serendipity in scientific discovery. That role is well known (most know of the story of Fleming’s accidental discovery of penicillin) but much of the literature focuses on the STEM disciplines, on ‘big’ science, and concentrates on the work of established scientists. There is virtually no discussion of the role of serendipity in the doctoral research arena, an arena which contributes significantly to contemporary scientific endeavour and the associated publications. This article reports the initial results from a survey of doctoral students and PhD graduates which explores how serendipity contributes to the PhD process and also the forms serendipity takes in this arena. Following the conceptual differentiation of serendipity from accident or chance, the article explores the intersection of serendipity with doctoral research. Most respondents reported serendipitous occurrences happening in the doctoral experience, with the most important involving them stumbling across unexpected and unsearched-for literature, meeting others who proved to be significant for both their research and also their future development and careers, and finding project-related artefacts which expanded their projects and thinking. There were also reports of second-hand serendipity a hitherto uncommented on phenomenon. Many of the serendipitous occurrences involved a social context and actors other than the doctoral student, placing a focus on the researcher as someone with the ability and opportunities to make connections rather than simply relying on luck.
Questions for Twitter
- To what extent does your research show us serendipity is a skill?
- In the article at the end, the quotation mentions being ‘immersed’ in the research project and seeing answers everywhere – is this kind of ‘immersion’ part of the skill of serendipity?
- As you point out, many of us have experienced the doctoral thesis as non-linear…why do you think the idea that it is a linear process continues to persist, and how can serendipity research change that mythology for the better?
- Do you think serendipity is more social than it is normally presented?
- Are serendipity skills then mostly social skills, or is it the same kind of skill applied to either people or, for example, books in the library?
- Do you think the lack of participation at real life conferences which you highlight as key moments of serendipity make serendipity less likely in Covid-19?
Citation & Links:
McCulloch, Alistair. (2021). Serendipity in doctoral education: the importance of chance and the prepared mind in the PhD. Journal of Further and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1905157
Is there a paper about serendipity that you would like to discuss in the journal club? Contact us at the Society email (see our contact page, here) to let us know.
Need a copy of the paper but don’t have access? Email the Society at our email address and we can send you one, with the author’s permission. Our contact page is here!